The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2514•Keith B. Shamberger v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, d/b/a ASC; SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP
13-2514Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 21, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2514
KEITH B. SHAMBERGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, d/b/a
ASC; SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00645-JAG)
Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith B. Shamberger, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith B. Shamberger appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his pro se complaint against Defendants after a
review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Shamberger
v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:13-cv-00645-JAG (E.D. Va. Nov.
13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.