The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2429•Hong Qing Huang v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
13-2429Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 8, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2429
HONG QING HUANG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: May 8, 2014
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Christophe, CHRISTOPHE LAW GROUP, P.C., New York, New
York, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney
General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, Aric A.
Anderson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hong Qing Huang, a native and citizen of the People’s
Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motions to
reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the administrative
record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion.
We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated
by the Board. See In re: Hong Qing Huang (B.I.A. Nov. 1, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.