The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2387•Freda G. Bolling v. Virginia Department of Health
13-2387Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2387
FREDA G. BOLLING,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00593-REP-DJN)
Submitted: April 29, 2014 Decided: May 2, 2014
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freda G. Bolling, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming,
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Freda G. Bolling appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment to Defendant in this employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bolling v. Virginia Dep’t of Health, No. 3:12-cv-00593-
REP-DJN (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.