The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2385•Ramona Claire Osborn; John Henry Osborn, Ii; Roberta Lynn Osborn v. United States of America
13-2385Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2385
RAMONA CLAIRE OSBORN; JOHN HENRY OSBORN, II; ROBERTA LYNN
OSBORN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02159-RDB)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramona Claire Osborn, John Henry Osborn, II, and Roberta Lynn
Osborn, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ramona Claire Osborn, John Henry Osborn, II, and
Roberta Lynn Osborn appeal the district court’s order denying
relief on their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Osborn v. United States,
No. 1:13-cv-02159-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.