The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2352•Walter Lee Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education, d/b/a Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
13-2352Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2352
WALTER LEE WHITAKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NASH-ROCKY MOUNT BOARD OF EDUCATION, d/b/a Nash-Rocky Mount
Public Schools; ROBBIN BODDIE-HAGGINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00623-BO)
Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Lee Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr.,
Donna Rhea Rascoe, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to defendants on his claim of
retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No.
5:12-cv-00623-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.