The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2313•Ahmad Halim v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners
13-2313Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2313
AHMAD HALIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ANDRES ALONSO; NEIL E. DUKE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:11-cv-02265-WMN)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ahmad Halim, Appellant Pro Se. Randi Klein Hyatt, Darrell
Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ahmad Halim appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims of
age, religion, and national origin discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Halim
v. Balt. City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:11-cv-02265-WMN (D. Md.
Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.