The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2286•Victor L. Padilla v. Roy O. Priest; Braddock W. Reynolds Ltd. Partnership
13-2286Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2286
VICTOR L. PADILLA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROY O. PRIEST; BRADDOCK W. REYNOLDS LTD. PARTNERSHIP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00888-GBL-TCB)
Submitted: February 19, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor L. Padilla, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Jay Weiser,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor L. Padilla appeals the district court’s order
dismissing Padilla’s civil case. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Padilla v. Priest, No.
1:13-cv-00888-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.