The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2273•Wei Wei Weng v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General for the United States
13-2273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 18, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2273
WEI WEI WENG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General for the United
States,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: July 22, 2014 Decided: August 18, 2014
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oleh R. Tustaniwsky, Brooklyn, New York, for Petitioner.
Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier,
Assistant Director, Brendan P. Hogan, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wei Wei Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s
Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the
Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying her requests for
asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the
Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the
record, including the transcript of Weng’s merits hearing and
her supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence
does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative
findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision to uphold the
IJ’s denial of Weng’s applications for relief. See INS v.
Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re: Wei Wei Weng (B.I.A. Nov. 14, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.