The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2245•Paul D. Atwood v. Commissioner, Social Security
13-2245Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2245
PAUL D. ATWOOD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate
Judge. (1:11-cv-01742-SAG)
Submitted: March 28, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul D. Atwood, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Craig Ormson, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul D. Atwood appeals the magistrate judge’s order*
upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Atwood’s application for
disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Atwood v. Comm’r, No.
1:11-cv-01742-SAG (D. Md. Aug. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the
magistrate judge.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.