Cynthia Phillips v. Raytheon Applied Signal Technology, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2243
CYNTHIA PHILLIPS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAYTHEON APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-03230-ELH)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cynthia Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Frier Wiltsie, HUNTON
& WILLIAMS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Phillips appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint alleging employment discrimination.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Phillips’
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Phillips has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. Phillips v. Raytheon Applied Signal Tech., Inc., No.
1:11-cv-03230-ELH (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --