The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2242•Starsha Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services
13-2242Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 10, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2242
STARSHA SEWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:12-cv-02402-DKC)
Submitted: February 24, 2014 Decided: March 10, 2014
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie A. Lewis, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order
denying, for want of jurisdiction, her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order
remanding this action to state court. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince
George’s Cnty. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 8:12-cv-02402-DKC (D.
Md. Oct. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.