The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2148•La Tricia Hardy v. Verizon
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2148
LA TRICIA HARDY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VERIZON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-02095-JFM)
Submitted: January 28, 2014 Decided: February 6, 2014
Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
La Tricia Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Victoria Calomeris,
ANDERSON & QUINN, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
La Tricia Hardy appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her action under
the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et. seq. (2012)
and denying her motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardy v. Verizon,
No. 8:12-cv-02095-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.