Charlie Richardson v. Ray Mabus

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2144
CHARLIE RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAY MABUS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:13-cv-01207-AW)
Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlie Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-
Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charlie Richardson appeals the district court’s order
granting Ray Mabus’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,
for summary judgment, on Richardson’s discrimination and
retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(West 2003 & Supp. 2012), and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634
(West 2008 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Richardson v. Mabus, No. 8:13-cv-01207-AW (D.
Md. Aug. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --