The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2115•Flaubert Mbongo; Charlotte J. Dikongue v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.a.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.
13-2115Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2115
FLAUBERT MBONGO; CHARLOTTE J. DIKONGUE,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-00872-PJM)
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Flaubert Mbongo, Charlotte J. Dikongue, Appellants Pro Se. John
Sears Simcox, SIMCOX & BARCLAY, Annapolis, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Flaubert Mbongo and Charlotte Dikongue appeal the
district court’s order granting summary judgment to the
Defendants in their civil action related to a mortgage
modification plan under the federal Home Affordable Modification
Program (HAMP). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Mbongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
No. 8:12-cv-00872-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.