The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-2020•In re: La’shan Deneice Johnson
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2020
In Re: LA’SHAN DENEICE JOHNSON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:13-cv-04401)
Submitted: October 8, 2013 Decided: October 10, 2013
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
La’Shan Deneice Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
La’Shan Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus,
claiming that the district court has unduly delayed issuing a
ruling on her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) motion and petition for
mandamus. She seeks an order from this court directing the
district court to act. We find that the present record does not
reveal undue delay by the district court. Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus
petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.