The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1925•Lourdes Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.p.
13-1925Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1925
LOURDES IGLESIAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST L.P.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS)
Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lourdes Iglesias, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis,
LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion to set aside judgment for
fraud upon the court. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P., No. 2:09-cv-
00008-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. filed July 15, 2013; entered July 16,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.