The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1918•Todd M. Jack v. Virginia Employment Commission
13-1918Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1918
TODD M. JACK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00350-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: November 4, 2013 Decided: November 8, 2013
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Noah Lief, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1),
(b)(6) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v.
Virginia Employment Comm’n, No. 1:13-cv-00350-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va.
June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.