The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1911•Jay Thomas v. U.s. Department of Education
13-1911Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 25, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1911
JAY THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:13-cv-01375-DKC)
Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jay Thomas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his complaint against the
Department of Education. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’ motion for
jurisdiction and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Thomas v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., No. 8:13-cv-01375-DKC (D.
Md. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.