The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1908•Carol Schulte v. Joseph Murtha; Ruth Jakubowski; Karen Pilarski
13-1908Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1908
CAROL SCHULTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH MURTHA; RUTH JAKUBOWSKI; KAREN PILARSKI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02919-RDB)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carol Schulte, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carol Schulte appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Schulte v. Murtha,
No. 1:12-cv-02919-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 22, 2013; June 17, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.