The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1861•Robert Christopher Kettenburg v. Geico Insurance
13-1861Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1861
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER KETTENBURG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEICO INSURANCE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:13-cv-01644-PJM)
Submitted: August 21, 2013 Decided: August 29, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.
Robert Christopher Kettenburg, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Christopher Kettenburg appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Kettenburg v.
GEICO Ins., No. 8:13-cv-01644-PJM (D. Md. June 19, 2013). We
deny Kettenburg’s motion for waiver of service. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.