The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1853•Clarence D. Johnson v. HENRICO COUNTY GOVERNMENT; LANCE WATSON, Dr.; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
13-1853Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1853
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRICO COUNTY GOVERNMENT; LANCE WATSON, Dr.; DEPARTMENT OF
MOTOR VEHICLES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00286-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: August 30, 2013 Decided: September 11, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence D. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Johnson v. Henrico Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:13-
cv-00286-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. June 19, 2013). We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.