The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1829•Audrey Scott v. Tiaa-Cref
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1829
AUDREY SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIAA-CREF,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Audrey Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Felicia A. Washington, K&L
GATES LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Audrey Scott appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint alleging discrimination and
retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Scott v. TIAA-CREF, No. 3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK
(W.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.