Audrey Scott v. Tiaa-Cref

13-1829Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2013

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1829
AUDREY SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIAA-CREF,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Audrey Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Felicia A. Washington, K&L
GATES LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Audrey Scott appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint alleging discrimination and
retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Scott v. TIAA-CREF, No. 3:12-cv-00697-FDW-DCK
(W.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.