The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1811•M. Nawaz Raja; Neelum Nawaz Raja v. Segan, Mason & Mason, Pc
13-1811Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 21, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1811
M. NAWAZ RAJA; NEELUM NAWAZ RAJA,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
SEGAN, MASON & MASON, PC; AIMEE T. H. KESSLER; ANDREW P.
HILL; WILLIAM BRADLEY MASON, JR.; ELIZABETH M. CREGO; MARY
ELLEN DEATLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00418-TSE-IDD)
Submitted: November 19, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013
Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
M. Nawaz Raja; Neelum Nawaz Raja, Appellants Pro Se. John
Elphinstone McIntosh, Jr., HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
M. Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Raja v.
Segan, Mason & Mason, P.C., No. 1:13-cv-00418-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va.
filed June 17, 2013, and entered June 18, 2013) We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.