Makarand Bidwai v. HILDA L. SOLIS, U.S. Secretary of Labor & her Designee, the ARB, the OALJ

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1750
MAKARAND BIDWAI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HILDA L. SOLIS, U.S. Secretary of Labor & her Designee, the
ARB, the OALJ; M. PATRICIA SMITH, U.S. Labor's Solicitor's
Office (for her subordinates); DAN DALY, U.S. Labor's WHD
FoIA (and his subordinates); PG COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD
OF EDUCATION; JOHN DOE 1, PGCPS; JANE DOE 1, PGCPS; JOHN
DOE 2, PGCPS; JANE DOE 2, PGCPS; PGCEA-MSTA/NEA; JOHN DOE
3; JANE DOE 3; NANCY J. LEPPINK, US Labor's WHD Ex
(Deputy) Administrators and her Designees; DIANE C.
KOPLEWSKI, US Labor's WHD Ex Immigration Branch Chief;
GEORGE G. FERENCE, US Labor's WHD Regional Administrator;
DANIEL J. CRONIN, US Labor WHD Ex District Director;
JOHN R. KELLY, US Labor WHD Ex District Director;
BEZARAH B. GAITHER, US Labor WHD Ex District Director;
MARYLAND STATE EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MARY BETH MAXWELL, U.S. Labor's WHD (Deputy) Administrator,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-03680-JFM)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Makarand Bidwai, Appellant Pro Se. Geoffrey Forney, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Glenn Matthew Girdharry, Senior
Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C.; Jeffrey Elliot Rockman,
SEROTTE, ROCKMAN & WESCOTT, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Makarand Bidwai appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil action alleging numerous statutory and
constitutional violations for failure to state a claim and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Bidwai v. Solis, No. 8:12-cv-03680-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 9 &
June 3, 2013). We deny Bidwai’s motion for judicial notice. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --