The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1747•Christine M. Lucas v. Citimortgage Inc.
13-1747Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1747
CHRISTINE M. LUCAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITIMORTGAGE INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:13-cv-01196-AW)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christine M. Lucas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christine M. Lucas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant
to the Rooker-Feldman* doctrine. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Lucas v. CitiMortgage, Inc., No.
8:13-cv-01196-AW (D. Md. filed May 21, 2013 & entered May 22,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983);
Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.