The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1714•Hendrick Townsend v. COUNTY OF ACCOMACK, Department of Building
13-1714Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1714
HENDRICK TOWNSEND,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF ACCOMACK, Department of Building and Zoning;
DAVID FLUHART, Director; STEVEN MINER, County
Administrator; MARK BOWDEN; TOM WILLET; DAVE ENGLEHART;
GRACIE MILBOURNE; WALTER WESSELS; LARRY GIDDENS; TODD
GODWIN; BILLY MURPHY, Deputy; THOMAS DIX; NANCY MATTHEWS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00305-MSD-LRL)
Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hendrick Townsend, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville,
NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hendrick Townsend appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil case. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Townsend v. Cnty. of Accomack,
No. 2:12-cv-00305-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.