The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1712•WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, Jr., a/k/a William Scott Davis, II v. United States of America
13-1712Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1712
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, Jr., a/k/a William Scott Davis, II and
a minor child JFD, as next best friend,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00062-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing of his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint for
failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis
v. United States, No. 4:13-cv-00062-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. May 21,
2013). We deny Davis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.