The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1703•Lisa McKinney v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
13-1703Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 18, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1703
LISA MCKINNEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH)
Submitted: November 26, 2013 Decided: December 18, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida;
Paul Townsend McChesney, MCCHESNEY & MCCHESNEY, PC, Spartanburg,
South Carolina, for Appellant. Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United
States Attorney, Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney,
Jeanne D. Semivan, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lisa McKinney appeals the district court’s orders:
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying McKinney’s
applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental
security income; and denying her motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McKinney v. Colvin, No. 1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C.
Jan. 25 & Apr. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.