The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1699•Arnold Benson Clarke v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Incorporated
13-1699Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1699
ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00206-JAG)
Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnold Benson Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arnold Benson Clarke appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Clarke v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., No. 3:13-
cv-00206-JAG (E.D. Va. May 20, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.