The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1679•Nancy E. Legum; Anthony E. Kurtz v. RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC., Successor to J.B. Hanauer & Co; SAMUEL KLUFT KOLTUN
13-1679Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1679
NANCY E. LEGUM; ANTHONY E. KURTZ,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC., Successor to J.B. Hanauer & Co;
SAMUEL KLUFT KOLTUN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-03773-JFM)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy E. Legum, Anthony E. Kurtz, Appellants Pro Se. Daniel
Joseph Donovan, Priscilla Alden Donovan, DONOVAN & RAINIE, LLC,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nancy E. Legum and Anthony E. Kurtz appeal the
district court’s orders denying relief in their civil action and
denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Legum v. RBC Capital
Mkts., LLC, No. 8:12-cv-03773-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2013; May 13,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.