MARIE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, Party-in-Interest - Appellant, and JONATHAN DAVID MCCOY v. City of Columbia

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1593
MARIE ASSA’AD-FALTAS,
Party-in-Interest - Appellant,
and
JONATHAN DAVID MCCOY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF COLUMBIA; JOHN K. PASSMORE, in his individual and
official capacity; JAMES HEYWOOD, in his individual and
official capacity; AMANDA H. LONG, in her individual and
official capacity,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
COLUMBIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00132-JFA)
Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: December 19, 2013
Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Michael
Balthazor, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
Carolina; Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, MBR LAW, LLC, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district
court’s order summarily denying her motion for a permanent
injunction. Assa’ad-Faltas has also filed an application to
proceed in forma pauperis, as well as motions to mediate the
appeal, to impose sanctions, and to strike the Appellees’
informal brief. The Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss
the appeal, to dismiss the City of Columbia from the appeal, and
for sanctions against Assa’ad-Faltas.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant Assa’ad-Faltas’s
application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the remaining
pending motions and affirm the district court’s order. Assa’ad-
Faltas v. City of Columbia, No. 5:10-cv-00132-JFA (D.S.C. May 1,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --