The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1551•Clarence D. Johnson v. Wells Fargo
13-1551Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 12, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1551
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00419-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: June 24, 2013 Decided: July 12, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence D. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Johnson v. Wells Fargo, No. 1:13-cv-00419-
LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and deny the motion for appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.