The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1549•Evelyn R. Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance Company
13-1549Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1549
EVELYN R. SINKLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: June 10, 2013 Decided: June 14, 2013
Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se. David Drake Hudgins,
HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrea Rose Simmons,
S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, PC, Carmel, Indiana, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Sinkler’s
claims regarding a disability income rider to her life insurance
policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sinkler v. Conseco Life Ins. Co., No.
1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2013). We also deny as
moot the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as prematurely
filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.