The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1545•George L. Petty; Steven L. Petty v. Joseph N. Crosswhite
13-1545Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1545
GEORGE L. PETTY; STEVEN L. PETTY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JOSEPH N. CROSSWHITE; THEODORE S. ROYSTER; DONNA S. STROUD;
MARTHA A. GEER; CRESSIE H. THIGPEN, JR.; BARBARA JACKSON;
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:12-cv-00162-WO-JLW)
Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George L. Petty; Steven L. Petty, Appellants Pro Se. Grady L.
Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Melanie Dawn Johnson Raubach, HAMILTON, STEPHENS,
STEELE & MARTIN, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George L. Petty and Steven L. Petty appeal the
district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Petty v. Crosswhite, No. 1:12-cv-00162-
WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.