Kendall R. Smith v. Verizon Washington, Dc, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1531
KENDALL R. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VERIZON WASHINGTON, DC, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
VERIZON MID-ATLANTIC, INCORPORATED; VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS,
INCORPORATED; REED SMITH LLP,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:11-cv-01301-PJM)
Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendall R. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Tillman J. Breckenridge,
REED SMITH, LLP, Washington, DC, Helenanne Connolly, REED SMITH,
LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, Betty S. W. Graumlich, REED SMITH,
LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Kendall R. Smith appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Verizon Washington, DC, Inc.,
Smith’s former employer, in Smith’s action alleging violations
of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Family and Medical
Leave Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Smith v. Verizon Washington, DC, Inc., No.
8:11-cv-01301-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --