The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1521•Cluck-U, Corp. v. Keith Dougherty, on behalf of Docson Consulting LLC
13-1521Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1521
CLUCK-U, CORP.,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH DOUGHERTY, on behalf of Docson Consulting LLC,
Appellant,
MICHAEL GHIGLIERI,
Defendant – Appellant,
and
C.U.C. OF MARYLAND, INC.; KEN & JIM C.U.C., INC.; KENNETH A.
BRADY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:10-cv-02105-DKC)
Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 26, 2013
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Michael Ghiglieri and Keith Dougherty, Appellants Pro Se.
Richard Charles Daniels, DANIELS & DANIELS, LLC, College Park,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Keith Dougherty and Michael Ghiglieri appeal the
district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4),
(6) motion for relief from a state court judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Cluck-U, Corp. v. Dougherty, No. 8:10-cv-02105-DKC (D. Md. Mar.
21, 2013). We deny as moot Appellants’ motion to adopt a brief
filed in a Tenth Circuit case. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.