The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1434•Trey Z. Cooper v. Dsm Nutritional Products, LLC
13-1434Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1434
TREY Z. COOPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:11-cv-02553-RBH)
Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pheobe A. Clark, WUKELA LAW FIRM, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellant. Christopher G. Mackaronis, BRICKFIELD, BURCHETTE,
RITTS & STONE, PC, Washington, D.C.; Jonathan P. Pearson, FISHER
AND PHILLIPS LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Trey Z. Cooper appeals from the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment in favor of DSM Nutritional Products,
LLC, in Cooper’s employment discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Prods., LLC, No. 4:11-cv-02553-RBH
(D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.