The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1420•Arthur O. Armstrong v. QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County
13-1420Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 10, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1420
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; RACHEL
JOYNER, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00425-F)
Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: May 10, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner,
No. 5:12-cv-00425-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.