The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1416•Eric S. Clark v. the City of Fairfax, Virginia
13-1416Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1416
ERIC S. CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE CITY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA; THOMAS E. GALLAHUE,
Individually and in official capacity as agent of the City
of Fairfax, Virginia; L. D. DOEBEL, police officer badge
#1113, Individually and in official capacity as employee of
the City of Fairfax, Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00295-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric S. Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric S. Clark appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action challenging his conviction of two
traffic violations. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Clark v. City of Fairfax, No. 1:13-cv-
00295-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.