The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1386•Francis J. Locraft v. Air Line Pilots Association, International
13-1386Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1386
FRANCIS J. LOCRAFT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL; AETNA, INC.;
ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS; UNION SECURITY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00062-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francis J. Locraft, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard Joseph DiMuro,
Jonathan Richard Mook, DIMUROGINSBERG, PC, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Francis J. Locraft appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Locraft’s
motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Locraft v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n,
No. 1:13-cv-00062-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.