The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1370•Midland Mortgage Company, a South Carolina Corporation v. Wells Fargo Bank Na, a national banking association
13-1370Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 30, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1370
MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, a South Carolina Corporation,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK NA, a national banking association,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00244-MBS)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 30, 2013
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William W. Watkins, Sr., WILLIAM W. WATKINS, P.A., Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellant. Ronald J. Tryon, Lawrence M.
Hershon, PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Midland Mortgage Company (“Midland”) appeals the
district court’s judgment granting Wells Fargo Bank, NA’s
summary judgment motion on Midland’s negligence and negligent
misrepresentation claims. We have considered Midland’s
arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. Midland Mortgage Co. v. Wells
Fargo Bank, NA, No. 3:12-cv-00244-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 25, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.