The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1340•Charmaine L. Anderson v. GREGORY JACKO, Commissioner, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
13-1340Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 6, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1340
CHARMAINE L. ANDERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GREGORY JACKO, Commissioner, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:11-cv-01370-JFM)
Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 6, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charmaine L. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charmaine L. Anderson appeals from the district
court’s orders dismissing her employment discrimination
complaint, denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for
reconsideration, and denying her subsequent motion to alter or
amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the
reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Jacko, No.
8-11-cv-01370-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 11, 2013). In addition, we note
that Anderson has waived certain claims by failing to raise them
in her informal brief, see Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr.,
Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009), and has waived other
claims by raising them for the first time on appeal. See
Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.