The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1320•In re: GEORGE JEFFERSON, III, a/k/a Ace
13-1320Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1320
In re: GEORGE JEFFERSON, III, a/k/a Ace,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(No. 5:09-cr-00251-FL-1)
Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Jefferson, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Jefferson, III, petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in
ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in
the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition.
We grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.