The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1254•Tyrone Hurt v. Department of Corrections of the State of Maryland
13-1254Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1254
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; ALL
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE FORTY NINE STATES OF THE
USA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
(8:09-cv-01248-RWT)
Submitted: June 17, 2013 Decided: June 28, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying
his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Dep’t of
Corr., No. 8:09-cv-01248-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.