The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1253•Charlie C. Kemp, Jr. v. Volvo Group North America, Inc.
13-1253Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1253
CHARLIE C. KEMP, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:11-cv-00535-SGW-RSB)
Submitted: September 13, 2013 Decided: October 2, 2013
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlie C. Kemp, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James M. Coleman,
CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charlie C. Kemp, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to the Defendant, his former
employer, in this action pursuant to the Americans with
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 2006 & Supp.
2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Kemp v. Volvo Group North America, Inc., No.
7:11-cv-00535-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.