The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1206•Rubina Ranjha v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
13-1206Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1206
RUBINA RANJHA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: October 15, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mumtaz A. Wani, WANI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Falls Church, Virginia,
for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, Jennifer J. Keeney, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Arthur L. Rabin, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rubina Ranjha, a native and citizen of Pakistan,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed
the administrative record and Ranjha’s claims and find no abuse
of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013). We accordingly
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re: Ranjha, (B.I.A. Jan. 18, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.