Thomas L. Switzer v. Judith Weaver

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1138
THOMAS L. SWITZER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JUDITH WEAVER,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
FELICIA HOUSDEN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00057-MFU-JGW)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013
Before MOTZ* and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
* Judge Motz did not participate in the consideration of the
this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Griggs, SANDS
ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v.
Weaver, No. 5:12-cv-00057-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --