The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1108•Valley Camp Coal Company v. Fenton Hill
13-1108Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 8, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1108
VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
FENTON HILL; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(12-0112-BLA)
Submitted: July 26, 2013 Decided: August 8, 2013
Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William S. Mattingly, Christopher M. Green, JACKSON KELLY PLLC,
Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Sandra M. Fogel,
CULLEY & WISSORE, Carbondale, Illinois, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Valley Camp Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits
Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative
law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.
§§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is
without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. Valley Camp Coal
Co. v. Hill, No. 12-0112-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 26, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.