The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1037•Betty Jane Ayers v. Sheetz, Inc.
13-1037Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1037
BETTY JANE AYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHEETZ, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00434)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Betty Jane Ayers, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Todd Hughes,
PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Betty Jane Ayers appeals the district court’s order
entering judment in favor of the Defendant/Appellee in
accordance with the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed the
record, including the transcript of the trial and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Ayers’
motion to vacate judgment and grant the Appellee’s motion to
submit on briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.