The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-1001•Roman Tiffer v. Worker’s Compensation
13-1001Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1001
ROMAN TIFFER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WORKER’S COMPENSATION; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
CORPORATION; ABACUS CORPORATION; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
BALTIMORE CITY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-03662-CCB)
Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roman Tiffer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action seeking reversal of a state court
judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
Tiffer’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the
district court’s disposition, Tiffer has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.